Yet more unit tests, no new failures
This commit is contained in:
parent
a0882f7ebd
commit
4c5867b390
2 changed files with 67 additions and 25 deletions
|
|
@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
|
|||
[walkmap.path :as p]
|
||||
[walkmap.polygon :as q]
|
||||
[walkmap.superstructure :refer :all]
|
||||
[walkmap.tag :as t]
|
||||
[walkmap.utils :as u]
|
||||
[walkmap.vertex :as v]))
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -45,9 +46,9 @@
|
|||
;; the value of `s` here is hand-typed; think of it as a specification
|
||||
(let [s {:path1 {:walkmap.id/id :path1
|
||||
:kind :path
|
||||
:vertices [:vert_0_0_0
|
||||
:vert_0_0_1
|
||||
:vert_1_0_0]}
|
||||
:vertices '(:vert_0_0_0
|
||||
:vert_0_0_1
|
||||
:vert_1_0_0)}
|
||||
:vert_0_0_0 {:walkmap.id/id :vert_0_0_0
|
||||
:kind :vertex
|
||||
:x 0
|
||||
|
|
@ -68,9 +69,67 @@
|
|||
:vert_1_0_0 {:path1 :vert_1_0_0}}}
|
||||
expected {:kind :path,
|
||||
:vertices
|
||||
({:kind :vertex, :x 0, :y 0, :z 0, :walkmap.id/id :vert_0_0_0}
|
||||
{:kind :vertex, :x 0, :y 0, :z 1, :walkmap.id/id :vert_0_0_1}
|
||||
{:kind :vertex, :x 1, :y 0, :z 0, :walkmap.id/id :vert_1_0_0}),
|
||||
'({:kind :vertex, :x 0, :y 0, :z 0, :walkmap.id/id :vert_0_0_0}
|
||||
{:kind :vertex, :x 0, :y 0, :z 1, :walkmap.id/id :vert_0_0_1}
|
||||
{:kind :vertex, :x 1, :y 0, :z 0, :walkmap.id/id :vert_1_0_0}),
|
||||
:walkmap.id/id :path1}]
|
||||
(is (= (retrieve :path1 s) expected)
|
||||
"The object reconstructed from the superstructure."))))
|
||||
|
||||
(deftest round-trip-test
|
||||
(testing "Roundtripping an object through the superstructure."
|
||||
(let [p (p/path
|
||||
(v/vertex (rand) (rand) (rand))
|
||||
(v/vertex (rand) (rand) (rand))
|
||||
(v/vertex (rand) (rand) (rand))
|
||||
(v/vertex (rand) (rand) (rand)))
|
||||
id (:walkmap.id/id p)
|
||||
s (store p)
|
||||
r (retrieve id s)]
|
||||
(is (= p r) "As it was, so it shall be."))))
|
||||
|
||||
(deftest multi-object-round-trip-test
|
||||
(testing "Roundtripping two different objects through a superstructure."
|
||||
(let [p (p/path
|
||||
(v/vertex (rand) (rand) (rand))
|
||||
(v/vertex (rand) (rand) (rand))
|
||||
(v/vertex (rand) (rand) (rand))
|
||||
(v/vertex (rand) (rand) (rand)))
|
||||
q (p/path
|
||||
(v/vertex (rand) (rand) (rand))
|
||||
(v/vertex (rand) (rand) (rand))
|
||||
(v/vertex (rand) (rand) (rand))
|
||||
(v/vertex (rand) (rand) (rand)))
|
||||
pid (:walkmap.id/id p)
|
||||
qid (:walkmap.id/id q)
|
||||
s (store q (store p))
|
||||
rp (retrieve pid s)
|
||||
rq (retrieve qid s)]
|
||||
(is (= p rp) "As `p` was, so it shall be.")
|
||||
(is (= q rq) "As `q` was, so it shall be.")
|
||||
(is (not= pid qid)
|
||||
"It is not possible that the ids should be equal, since they are
|
||||
gensymmed")
|
||||
(is (not= rp rq)
|
||||
"It is not possible that the paths should be equal, since at
|
||||
minimum, their ids are gensymmed."))))
|
||||
|
||||
(deftest store-retrieve-edit-store-test
|
||||
(testing "After editing a retrieved object and storing it again, a further
|
||||
retrieve should return the new version."
|
||||
(let [p (p/path
|
||||
(v/vertex (rand) (rand) (rand))
|
||||
(v/vertex (rand) (rand) (rand))
|
||||
(v/vertex (rand) (rand) (rand))
|
||||
(v/vertex (rand) (rand) (rand)))
|
||||
id (:walkmap.id/id p)
|
||||
o (store p)
|
||||
r (retrieve id o)
|
||||
p' (t/tag
|
||||
(assoc r :vertices
|
||||
(conj (:vertices id) (v/vertex (rand) (rand) (rand))))
|
||||
:edited)
|
||||
o' (store p' o)
|
||||
r' (retrieve id o')]
|
||||
(is (not= r r') "The value referenced by `id` should have changed.")
|
||||
(is (= r' p') "The value referenced by `id` in `o'` should be equal to `p'`."))))
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue