jolt/bench/README.md
Yogthos ba58d7ec85 bench: document 64-bit arithmetic + generator numbers vs JVM
The AOT suite doesn't cover 64-bit integer arithmetic (Chez fixnums are 61-bit,
so genuine 64-bit values are bignums) — the SplitMix PRNG behind test.check is
the worst case. Add the measured jolt-vs-JVM numbers for the PRNG/mix-64 and the
generator workload: the bitwise native-ops + var-cell caching took mix-64 from
~18x to ~3.2x JVM and the PRNG from ~30x to ~12x; the residual is the open-world
generator dispatch/allocation and the bignum floor, not arithmetic.
2026-06-28 15:39:17 -04:00

120 lines
6.6 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# jolt benchmark suite
Benchmarks that isolate the workload axes jolt's optimizing passes target. The
ray tracer (`examples/ray-tracer`) is **float-compute-bound** — its time is
irreducible algorithmic math (hit-testing + transcendentals), and devirt,
allocation removal, and type-proving all measured **flat** on it. So it can't
tell us whether those passes work. These benchmarks make each pass's target
workload the *dominant* cost.
Reference: the cross-language suites these draw from —
[Are We Fast Yet?](https://github.com/smarr/are-we-fast-yet) (Marr et al., DLS '16)
and the [Computer Language Benchmarks Game](https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/).
The benchmarks are portable Clojure, so they also run on JVM Clojure for an
absolute reference.
## Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Axis | Pass it exercises | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| `binary-trees` | allocation / GC pressure (escaping short-lived records) | scalar-replace, escape analysis | CLBG |
| `dispatch` | polymorphic (**megamorphic**) protocol dispatch | devirt, inline-cache | AWFY-style |
| `mono-dispatch` | **monomorphic** protocol dispatch (devirt/inline-cache *can* fire) | devirt, inline-cache | AWFY-style |
| `collections` | persistent map/vector churn (HAMT / 32-way tries) | persistent structures, transients | CLBG k-nucleotide-style |
| `mandelbrot` | pure float compute (tight arith loops, no alloc/dispatch) | native arith, loop codegen | CLBG |
| `fib` | recursion: function-call + integer-arith overhead | native arith, small-fn inlining | CLBG |
What the ray tracer does **not** capture and these do: allocation as the
bottleneck (~7% there), megamorphic *and* monomorphic dispatch (its dispatch is
monomorphic and cheap), persistent-collection throughput (it uses fixed records,
no collections in the hot loop), and isolated compute/call overhead.
Planned additions: Richards / DeltaBlue (heavier OO dispatch), NBody (float
control with record state), k-nucleotide proper.
## Holistic scorecard
`bench/run.sh` compiles each benchmark to an **optimized AOT binary** (`joltc build
--direct-link --opt`) and times it against JVM Clojure running the same portable
source — the jolt/JVM scorecard. jolt's optimizing passes fire only in a build;
`joltc run -m` is unoptimized, so the harness always builds.
Indicative ratios (M-series, single isolated run — numbers are machine-specific,
regenerate locally), ascending:
| benchmark | ratio | axis |
|---|---|---|
| `fib` | ~0.6× | call + integer arith |
| `collections` | ~3.5× | persistent map/vector churn |
| `mandelbrot` | ~7.5× | pure float compute |
| `binary-trees` | ~10× | escaping short-lived records (allocation/GC) |
| `dispatch` | ~12× | megamorphic protocol dispatch |
| `mono-dispatch` | ~15× | monomorphic protocol dispatch |
- **Compute (~0.67.5×)** is the substrate floor: Chez is a native-compiling AOT
Scheme, not a profiling JIT. With native arith + direct-linking + inlining jolt
is at parity here — `fib` runs *faster* than JVM Clojure (no JIT warmup over a
short run), `collections` is within ~3.5×, and `mandelbrot` (~7.5×) is the
pure-tight-loop float ceiling that only native codegen moves further.
- **Dispatch & allocation (~1015×)** are the remaining architectural gaps, though
the type-proving / native-record / bare-field-read work has collapsed them by an
order of magnitude (`binary-trees` ~140×→~10×, `mono-dispatch` ~330×→~15×). On a
*statically proven* monomorphic receiver — which whole-program inference now gives
for a record iterated out of a vector — devirt resolves the impl and a per-site
inline cache holds it (resolved once, not per call), so `mono-dispatch` is no
longer worse than megamorphic. The remaining lever is `dispatch`: a *megamorphic*
site has no static type, so it pays a full protocol-registry lookup every call
where the JVM uses a polymorphic inline cache — a runtime (receiver-type-keyed)
cache is the missing piece. `binary-trees`
nodes escape into the tree, so scalar-replace can't remove them — residual GC
pressure.
## 64-bit integer arithmetic & generators (test.check)
The AOT suite above is float-compute / dispatch / allocation bound; none of it
exercises **64-bit integer arithmetic**, which Chez can't hold in a fixnum
(61-bit), so genuine 64-bit values are heap bignums. The SplitMix PRNG behind
`clojure.test.check` is the worst case — every `rand-long` is ~8 bignum ops. These
were measured in **run mode** (`joltc run`, where per-site var-cell caching is on;
the AOT build keeps it off) against JVM Clojure on the same portable source. The
first two rows are isolating microbenchmarks; the rest are real test.check
generators.
| workload | jolt | JVM | ratio | bound by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SplitMix `mix-64` (×100k) | 45ms | 14ms | ~3.2× | 64-bit integer arithmetic |
| deftype alloc + protocol dispatch (×100k) | 41ms | 5ms | ~8× | open-world dispatch |
| raw `split` + `rand-long` (×20k) | 74ms | 6ms | ~12× | bignum 64-bit + dispatch |
| `gen/large-integer` (×2k) | 108ms | 23ms | ~4.7× | arithmetic + rose-tree machinery |
| `(gen/vector gen/large-integer)` (×500) | 1289ms | 88ms | ~14.6× | element gen + gen machinery |
Two no-C codegen levers collapsed the **arithmetic** half: emitting `bit-and`/
`bit-or`/`bit-xor`/`bit-not` as inlined Chez `bitwise-*` primitives (they had gone
through a var-deref'd variadic overlay), and caching the resolved var cell per
reference site (a name lookup was ~45ns/access). Together they took `mix-64` from
~18× → ~3.2× JVM and the raw PRNG from ~30× → ~12×, and the generators ~1.6× each.
The residual gap is **machinery, not arithmetic**: the open-world generator
deftype/protocol dispatch + rose-tree allocation (~810×) can't be devirtualized
without static types, and the raw 64-bit ops bottom out at the Chez bignum floor
(~20× a native long, substrate-inherent). A native SplitMix C/FFI shim would give
the PRNG ~27× but is the only path that needs C.
## Running
```sh
bench/run.sh # full suite + JVM scorecard
bench/run.sh fib # one benchmark, default size
bench/run.sh fib 32 # one benchmark, custom size
NO_JVM=1 bench/run.sh # jolt only (skip the JVM reference)
```
Needs Chez's kernel dev files (`libkernel.a` + `scheme.h`) and `cc` for the build,
like `jolt build`; set `JOLT_CHEZ_CSV` to override the detected csv dir.
## A/B against a change
To measure a pass, run the suite on `main`, then on the branch, back to back
(same machine, quiet). Each benchmark prints `runs: [...]` and `mean: N ms`;
compare the means. A pass is worth landing when it moves a benchmark whose axis it
targets, even if the ray tracer stays flat.