jolt/docs/spec/03-special-forms.md

§3 Special Forms

Status: catalog complete; normative exemplars for if and let*; the remaining entries follow the same format (tracked in coverage.md).

A special form is a form whose head symbol is evaluated by rule rather than by function application or macroexpansion. The special forms of Clojure are:

def · if · do · let* · fn* · loop* · recur · quote · var · throw · try/catch/finally · set! · monitor-enter · monitor-exit (host) · the interop forms . and new (host)

let, fn, loop, and, or, when, … are macros over these (§8); implementations MUST treat them as redefinable macros, not additional special forms. monitor-enter/monitor-exit, . and new are host forms: their syntax is specified here, their behavior is host-defined.

Special-form head symbols are not shadowable: a binding named if does not change the meaning of (if ...) in operator position. ⚠ This matches the reference; it differs from Scheme.

---

if — since 1.0

(if test then)
(if test then else)

Semantics

• S1. test MUST be evaluated first, exactly once.
• S2. Every value other than nil and false is logically true. If the value of test is logically true, then MUST be evaluated and its value returned; otherwise else (or nil when absent) MUST be evaluated and its value returned.
• S3. The branch not taken MUST NOT be evaluated.
• S4. if MUST be usable in tail position with respect to recur (§3 recur): an if whose branch is a recur form is a valid recur target path.

Edge cases

• E1. (if test then) with a logically false test evaluates to nil.
• E2. The empty collections ((), [], {}, #{}), the number 0, and the empty string "" are logically true (only nil/false are false). ⚠ This differs from several Lisps and is a frequent divergence source in alternative implementations.

Errors

• X1. (if) and (if test) with fewer than two argument forms, or more than three, MUST be a compile-time error.

Examples

(if 0 :t :f)        ;=> :t
(if "" :t :f)       ;=> :t
(if nil :t :f)      ;=> :f
(if false :t)       ;=> nil

Conformance

S1–S3, E1–E2 → jolt forms-spec "if/do/def" group; truthiness group in truthiness-spec; clojure-test-suite core_test/if.cljc. S4 → forms-spec fn/loop recur cases. X1 → forms-spec "if arity (X1)" (0/1/4-arg forms throw in both the analyzer and the interpreter).

---

let* — since 1.0

(let* [sym₁ init₁ … symₙ initₙ] body…)

let* is the primitive sequential-binding form. The user-facing let macro adds destructuring and expands to let* (§8); let* itself accepts only simple symbols in binding positions.

Semantics

• S1. Each initᵢ MUST be evaluated in order, exactly once, in an environment where sym₁…symᵢ₋₁ are bound to their values (sequential scope, as Scheme let*).
• S2. The body forms MUST be evaluated in order with all bindings in scope; the value of the last body form is the value of the let* form. An empty body evaluates to nil.
• S3. A later binding MAY rebind the same symbol; each binding creates a new lexical binding visible from the next init onward (no mutation of the earlier binding is implied).
• S4. Bindings are lexical and immutable: there is no form that assigns to a let*-bound local. (Closures capture bindings by value; see §3 fn*.)
• S5. The binding vector MUST be a vector literal with an even number of forms.

Edge cases

• E1. (let* [] body) is valid and equivalent to (do body…).
• E2. Binding a symbol that names a var shadows the var for the lexical extent of the body; (var sym) within that extent still denotes the var.

Errors

• X1. An odd number of binding forms MUST be a compile-time error.
• X2. A non-symbol in a binding position (e.g. a destructuring pattern) MUST be a compile-time error for let* — destructuring belongs to the let macro. ("Bad binding form, expected symbol" in the reference.)

Examples

(let* [a 1 b (+ a 1)] (* a b))   ;=> 2
(let* [x 1 x (inc x)] x)         ;=> 2
(let* [] 42)                     ;=> 42

Conformance

S1–S3, E1 → jolt forms-spec let group; clojure-test-suite core_test/let.cljc; jank corpus form/let/*. X2 → jolt destructuring-spec "primitives reject patterns". S4, X1 → UNVERIFIED (cases to add).

---

Remaining entries (format above; status in coverage.md)

Form	Notes for the entry author
def	var creation vs re-binding; metadata on the name; (def x) unbound; return value is the var
do	empty (do) → nil; top-level do splices for compilation units (important and under-documented)
fn*	arities, variadic &, closure capture, self-name, simple-symbol params only, recur target
loop*	recur arity must match bindings; recur rebinds in place
recur	tail-position rule (normative definition of tail position needed), across if/do/let*/try interactions
quote	self-evaluation table: which literals are self-evaluating unquoted
var	#' reader sugar; resolution at compile time
throw	any value vs Throwable — host question; jolt/cljs allow data, reference requires Throwable → classification needed
try/catch/finally	catch dispatch order, :default-style catch-all is a dialect extension (⚠ divergence note), finally evaluation guarantees, value of try
set!	host-dependent (dynamic vars + host fields)
. / new	syntax only; behavior host-defined